'Diagrammatic documentality and inscription' have been proposed as a specific model of architectural design research. Tracing thinking processes, knowledge production, and spatial action diagrammatically, considering the opposition between propositional (linguistic) and diagrammatic logic, reasoning, and representation, 'diagrammatic mode of inference' has been claimed, developed and confirmed to be a relevant system of proof and thinking. ’Research diagrammatology’, as an instrument of mapping and recording, adds up to the status of 'design intelligence research strategy'. It enables new knowledge to emerge out of the established concepts, historical data systems and categories ('metahistorical archives/strata'); it provides their critical reassessment and deconstruction creating an open metalevel data-field from where it becomes possible to determine hidden relational patterns ('microhistorical connectivities') or to anticipate new ones through specific design strategy.
diagramma [design intelligence strategy]
This specific thinking strategy of data-scaping and data-scaping mode of representation has been developed in order to innovate design research models, methods, and instruments.
multiple timelines [microhistorical connectivities]
Design intelligence strategy could be applied as a formal and programmatic model/register for Advanced Design Intelligence Research (ADIR) and Projects (AIRP), based on cross-disciplinary academic and industry collaboration, solving scientific problems dealing with any kind of documentary or creative practice with data.
datascapes [meta-level data integration]
complexity and dynamics of 'information chatter' / territories for reconfiguration
datascapes [fields of information]
[digital memory palace]
Proposed spatial data-recordings [datascapes] could facilitate research within highly complex and massive funds of information as an extension of our thinking processes - their external, elastic cognitive devices and archives.
