Search

Idea by

Akil Scafe-Smith, Gameli Ladzekpo, Seth Scafe-Smith, Vishnu Jayarajan

RESOLVE

http://www.resolvecollective.com

Atlantic Road,, London, United Kingdom
The collective was founded in 2016, by UCL graduates Akil Scafe-Smith, who holds a Masters in Building and Urban Design in Development from the Bartlett DPU, and Gameli Ladzekpo who holds a Masters in Engineering.Collaboration and co-production is a critical part of our ethos; the first step towards realising more equitable visions of change.

If These Walls Could Talk


Deconstructing Architectures of Separation

If These Walls Could Talk


Deconstructing Architectures of Separation
What if walls did not separate us, but brought us together?
File under

Walls, as fundamental architectural elements, have long been archetypes of separation. They divide our homes, our cities and nations. They are pervasive, just as physical as they are metaphorical, and seemingly entrenched in our coexistence. Today, with most of Earth’s population in cities and closer together than ever, separation, exclusion, and marginalization are some of our most pressing social and architectural issues. Addressing this, our project reimagines the wall as a concept that brings us together. This vision demands a radical methodological shift in practice: to build by deconstruction. By this, deconstruction is not the destruction of the walls that perforate our social fabrics, but an excavation of the processes that lead to their divisiveness. It posits a future of architecture where debate, collaboration and inclusion are integral to how we design, and where changes in process, people and perspective can reveal collective senses of fairness, community, and belonging.



PEOPLE: Redefining a topos of separation as ubiquitous as the ‘wall’ is a challenge that simultaneously redefines otherwise widely accepted dichotomies in architecture of the ‘architect’ and ‘client’. Questioning how a wall might include rather than exclude, inevitably also asks who walls might include and exclude and who builds walls to exclude or include.

PROCESSES: Building often leads to division when the process is not collaborative and architectures tend to separate most effectively when they work towards the values of the least amount of people: the walls, borders and lines that have divided cities in the past and still divide many today are rarely decided upon, built or perpetuated by their inhabitants. Our vision determines the process of building (walls) a fundamentally collaborative one.

PERSPECTIVE: Considering the perspectives of a multitude of different people in the creation of space not only offers a vision of future that attests to our traditional and scientific senses, but one that also explores our sense of fairness, sense of community, sense of humour and even sense of belonging. How do these walls not only look, sound and feel but make us look, sound and feel? And if these walls could talk, what would they say?

If These Walls Could Talk


Deconstructing Architectures of Separation

If These Walls Could Talk


Deconstructing Architectures of Separation
What if walls did not separate us, but brought us together?
File under

Walls, as fundamental architectural elements, have long been archetypes of separation. They divide our homes, our cities and nations. They are pervasive, just as physical as they are metaphorical, and seemingly entrenched in our coexistence. Today, with most of Earth’s population in cities and closer together than ever, separation, exclusion, and marginalization are some of our most pressing social and architectural issues. Addressing this, our project reimagines the wall as a concept that brings us together. This vision demands a radical methodological shift in practice: to build by deconstruction. By this, deconstruction is not the destruction of the walls that perforate our social fabrics, but an excavation of the processes that lead to their divisiveness. It posits a future of architecture where debate, collaboration and inclusion are integral to how we design, and where changes in process, people and perspective can reveal collective senses of fairness, community, and belonging.



PEOPLE: Redefining a topos of separation as ubiquitous as the ‘wall’ is a challenge that simultaneously redefines otherwise widely accepted dichotomies in architecture of the ‘architect’ and ‘client’. Questioning how a wall might include rather than exclude, inevitably also asks who walls might include and exclude and who builds walls to exclude or include.

PROCESSES: Building often leads to division when the process is not collaborative and architectures tend to separate most effectively when they work towards the values of the least amount of people: the walls, borders and lines that have divided cities in the past and still divide many today are rarely decided upon, built or perpetuated by their inhabitants. Our vision determines the process of building (walls) a fundamentally collaborative one.

PERSPECTIVE: Considering the perspectives of a multitude of different people in the creation of space not only offers a vision of future that attests to our traditional and scientific senses, but one that also explores our sense of fairness, sense of community, sense of humour and even sense of belonging. How do these walls not only look, sound and feel but make us look, sound and feel? And if these walls could talk, what would they say?


Idea by

Akil Scafe-Smith, Gameli Ladzekpo, Seth Scafe-Smith, Vishnu Jayarajan
RESOLVE
Atlantic Road,
London
United Kingdom
The collective was founded in 2016, by UCL graduates Akil Scafe-Smith, who holds a Masters in Building and Urban Design in Development from the Bartlett DPU, and Gameli Ladzekpo who holds a Masters in Engineering.Collaboration and co-production is a critical part of our ethos; the first step towards realising more equitable visions of change.